around 29.8
Had is correct ! Anil went in right direction but ended up
with wrong answers
Soln: B lied ( see anil’s comment ) which implies B has not
stolen mule. So B could steal camel or sheep.
1) Lets assume B stole camel.
In that case, A lies ( refer – A says “B had stolen sheep”
), which implies A had stolen sheep ( becoz a lier cant
steal mule ). So A->sheep B->camel C->mule. But this cant
happen because C cant lie ( refer – C says ” B had stolen
mule” ).
2) Lets assume B stole sheep.
In that case, A is true ( refer – A says “B had stolen
sheep” ), which implies A had stolen mule. So A->Mule
B->Sheep C->camel. Here C lies ( refer – C says ” B had
stolen mule” )
SO ANS: answer A- mule, B-sheep, C camel
740
let the no be x
then given that the difference between the number and 3/5th
of the number is 50
therefor , x-3/5x=50
2x=250
x=125 is the answer
I am looking for a qualified chartered accountant in my profile who is known for his excellence in the field.
1920
300%
When I went to my native place the form is so good environment
12
In 30 mins- Thief – 20km, Owner – 0km
In 1hr – Thief – 40km, Owner – 25km
In 1.5hrs – Thief – 60km, Owner – 50km
In 2hrs – Thief – 80km, Owner – 75km
In 2.5hrs – Thief – 100km, Owner – 100km
Answer: In 2.5 hours the owner would have overtaken the Theif
190, 166, 145, 128, 112, 100, 91
128 is incorrect. There is a difference of multiples of 3 in the number pattern, which starts at 24 and reduces by 3 each time. Therefore the correct pattern would read 190, 166, 145, 127, 112, 100, 91.
this would leave the pattern with differences in the pattern 24, 21, 18, 15, 12, 9. The next number in the pattern would be 6 lower than 91. 91 – 6 = 85. Then 85 -3 – 82, followed by 82 – 0 = 82. After this, if -3 were taken the pattern would start to rise so 82 – – 3 = 85.
Pi * radius * radius
3.14 * 5 * 5